5/16/2023 0 Comments Unrealistic optimism isIn this group, 65 participants indicated that they thought they were at risk for type 2 diabetes, and 69 indicated that their peers were at risk for diabetes onset. Participants who reported having a blood relative with diabetes in their nuclear family had a moderately high risk perception (mean = 6.58, t = 10.740, df = 306, P = 0.000). In addition, 13% of the participants who had low risk perception reported having no daily servings of vegetables, 32.6% reported having 1 daily serving, 30.5% reported having 2 daily servings, 18% reported having 3 daily servings, and 5.9% reported having ≥4 daily vegetable servings. Within this group, 15.8% reported having no daily servings of fruit, 47.9% reported having an average of 1 daily serving, 27.1% reported having 2 servings, 6.3% reported having 3 servings, and 2.9% reported having ≥4 daily servings. Students who had a lower risk perception ( n = 241) exercised an average of 3.68 days/week. The second research question sought to identify differences in risk perceptions of type 2 diabetes onset between students who thought they were personally at risk for type 2 diabetes and those who thought other students were at risk. More than half (69%) of the excluded students were Caucasian, 16.3% were African American, 10% were Hispanic, 0.7% were Asian or South Pacific Islander, 0.7% were American Indian/Alaska Native, and 3.3% were of other ethnic or racial backgrounds (χ 2 = 625.160, df = 5, P = 0.000). The majority of the excluded participants thought their peers were the ones at risk for type 2 diabetes onset (“Others are at risk” 85.8% vs. A total of 105 students (35.0%) were classified as overweight, obese class 1, obese class 2, or extremely obese. The results showed that 358 participants were not sure about their risk for diabetes onset. Participants ( n = 358) who indicated that they did not know their risk for type 2 diabetes onset were omitted from the analyses. The first research question sought to determine whether there is a sex-related difference in type 2 diabetes risk perception. Eleven of the participants had been diagnosed with diabetes or prediabetes (type 1 diabetes n = 1, type 2 diabetes n = 2, gestational diabetes n = 5, and prediabetes n = 3). Less than one-fourth (21.5%) of the participants reported having a blood relative with diabetes in their nuclear family, whereas more than half (57.9%) indicated that they had a blood relative with diabetes in their extended family. More than half (55.9%) of the participants had a body weight within the normal range (18.5–24.9 kg/m 2), whereas 4.5% were classified as underweight (40 kg/m 2) ( 27). The mean BMI of participants was 24.77 ± 5.96 kg/m 2. Demographic characteristics of all respondents are shown in Table 1. Students who indicated they had diabetes were excluded from the dataset ( n = 8). Sex and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Perception: Gaps in ResearchĪ total of 660 students participated in the study. It has been proposed that individuals must perceive that they are at high risk of developing a disease to consider modifying their health behaviors to prevent its onset ( 18). A third study focusing on perceived susceptibility among college students found that 32% of a sample of 707 students perceived themselves to be susceptible to developing diabetes ( 17). Another study found that participants rated their risk for diabetes onset lower than their risk for heart disease ( 16). The results showed that participants who identified themselves as being part of a racial or ethnic group other than non-Hispanic white and who had family members with diabetes perceived an absolute 10-year risk of diabetes onset ( 15). One survey was designed to determine college students’ perception of their risk for developing diabetes in the next 10 years ( 15). A few studies of risk perception and diabetes have been conducted among college students. Risk perception for becoming ill is crucial to explaining why people engage in health-related behaviors ( 14). Individuals’ risk perception is based on their intuitive judgments when evaluating potential hazards ( 13).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |